EM, crew.
In the second installment of our collab series with Ontology we explore the intersection of gaming and decentralized identity, with a panel of Web3 builders, technologists, and IP experts to unpack how social systems shape the design and evolution of onchain games.
From cultural norms within blockchain ecosystems to the legacy of pseudonymous identity, the panel offered rich insights on what it means to build gamesâand player communitiesâon decentralized rails.
Missed the first recap? You can read it here:
Ryan, founder of Based Creators
Smoke, CEO of Own the Doge
Humpty, Geoff & Polaris â Contributors at Ontology
Panelists agreed that ownership and persistence are among blockchainâs most compelling features for gamingânot necessarily real-time mechanics.
âWe donât need every function onchain. What matters are outcomesâthings that define your identity and legacy as a player.â â Geoff (Ontology)
Examples like lost accounts, skins, or progress in traditional games served as reminders of the need for decentralized digital provenance. With blockchain, these moments become permanent, transferable, and verifiable.
Digital identityâespecially pseudonymous identityâwas another core topic.
âIn Web2, reputation is social. We associate usernames with skill and legacy. Blockchain enables this technically while preserving privacy.â â Juliun (Stability)
Decentralized identity lets players maintain consistent personas across games and ecosystems, which opens doors for trustless matchmaking, custom rewards, and social signalingâwithout ever revealing a real-world identities.
There was consensus that full onchain games aren't necessary (or optimal).
âGamers donât want every action to cost gas. You need seamless UX. Store what mattersâread from chain, donât write everything to it.â â Polaris (Ontology)
Key takeaways:
Real-time logic and high-frequency actions should remain offchain.
Milestones, achievements, and asset ownership belong onchain.
The conversation touched on how ecosystemsâwhether Solana, Base, or Farcasterâeach cultivate unique player expectations and game designs.
For example:
Base has emphasized creator culture and builder tooling.
Solana has prioritized speed and NFT trading culture.
Private chains may attract studios seeking more control over game mechanics.
These differences influence everything from incentive structures to moderation standards.
Joining live from Las Vegas, Ryan (Based Creators) and Smoke (Own the Doge) shared perspectives from the largest IP licensing convention in the U.S.
âTwo years ago, these brands wouldnât even say the word crypto. Now theyâre actively looking for ways to get involved.â â Smoke
Both emphasized that the conversation with Web2 brands isnât about tokens or marketplacesâitâs about:
New revenue streams
Legacy-building for IP
Community activation
Seamless integration (with or without mentioning âWeb3â)
Focus on outcomes, not functions. Store legacy moments, not every action.
Respect the value of pseudonymity. Verified, consistent identity doesnât need to be doxxed.
Donât lead with tech. Lead with benefitsârevenue, reach, community, permanence.
Meet Web2 where they are. Help them unlock new audiences and creator ecosystems.
Affordability and accessibility matter. Onchain gaming still has a UX and cost barrier to solve.
The next episode will dive deeper into transferable game assets and digital property rights. Weâll explore how onchain provenance can empower creators, developers, and players alike in a cross-game, multichain world.
đš Follow @OntologyNetwork to stay updated on upcoming episodes.


